WeвЂ™ll cover a few different areas and hopefully answer some of your lingering lingering questions you may have about Ontario building code. Today weвЂ™re going to help you understand the Ontario building code requirements for insulation and how it affects your home and insulation installation decisions. Those selling the home made the aesthetic decision for knobs in the beginning so they should bear the cost of replacement hardware if required.Many homes in the GTA were built long before Ontario building code requirements for insulation were available or before builders truly understood how ventilation and other factors affect the efficacy of your insulation. If more accessible hardware is required for those purchasing used homes (built after the date of new legislation), this hardware should be provided by the selling homeowners at no cost.

On re-sale of the home, those that opted for traditional knobs instead of levers shall pass on the same courtesy to prospective buyers. Builders вЂ“ simply include in the added cost of levered hardware to your estimates, and those that choose knobs might net you an extra few dollars at the end of the day. While I am not advocating that the contractor bear this cost, I feel a more reasoned approach would simply be to afford those with accessibility issues levered knobs at no additional cost to them, while affording those others their choice of hardware.

Those persons affected by accessibility issues should have the right to this hardware at no additional cost to them. As far as mandating that ALL new homes be built with accessibility in mind, I feel that the government is overreaching here. In terms of accessibility, it is definitely easier for those with aging/arthritic hands to open and close a door with levered hardware. I am very much in agreement with a National move towards better building codes for everyone. What do you think? Are doorknobs a thing of the past? Should we care that theyвЂ™ll eventually disappear from the market? Would you argue against these types of interfering building code changes on principle? He asks how far the government will go toward enforcing accessible design - will building codes eventually mandate walk-in showers and elevators instead of stairs? It even makes sense to encourage accessible design in multi-unit residential buildings, due to the fact there is greater turnover within them.Д«ut, as Kline argues, the government is stretching its nanny state arm a bit far when it starts dictating how people design and build the interior of their homes вЂ“ homes theyвЂ™re going to live in. I donвЂ™t think any of us can argue against making public buildings more accessible. But the city council is looking to influence the change in any case. Unlike Vancouver, Halifax doesnвЂ™t have the authority to make changes to the building code, which is under provincial jurisdiction. вЂњThey also have to match the orientation of the door, and can be hazardous to both children and clothing.вЂќДЄnyone whoвЂ™s ever had a toddler or caught the hem of their shirt on a levered door understands KlineвЂ™s argument. вЂњLevers are easier for small children and, as anyone whoвЂ™s watched Jurassic Park knows, velociraptors to open,вЂќ writes Kline.

Ontario building code of canada